Tags: radical
The false peace
by Duncan on ago.08, 2009, under human resistance , politics
There is a peace that reconciles and opens a new season.
It 'a peace that is swamp, stagnant water and rancid.
Do not just babble words of peace, harmony and dialogue.
Especially at the political level. But for me the political level is the opportunity for a broader profile of speech. Not cite it only for himself, such is the misery of the "level" in which it operates.
Instead it is emblematic of a distortion, often "aware".
And then, is the place to start affecting. It is one thing to talk about peace and dialogue during a civil war. This is another dusting armantario the political office. Different then the individual plan.
The simple harmony in and of itself is not necessarily a value. But it can also be a grave voltages required.
There is no peace without justice. There is no dialogue without integrity.
The flames can save the city from the fire. But the flames can be a great jam that dampens any pressure in a faint, sweetish connubbio.
That's why the "good blood volume" is not doing good. The blood volume good, greasy and incestuous goodism may be contested by two sides. Import side, the side says it all. One is the cynical, Nietzsche, the nihilist who denies the possibility of fine root and a human action that is not manipulative (and automanipolatorio) and concerned declassified each thrust idealistic to false consciousness, illusion. The other side does not tolerate blood volume well, because he prorpio compass as the Good, which considers (on good volume status)-infringement. And Good is sometimes a breakfast tarallucci and wine, is not an "appropriate" fall tones. It is not compromise at all costs. It is sometimes hard, sometimes demanding, sometimes does not flee the conflict. Can embrace, but he also knows not to yield. Sa deal, but
not to extinguish the soul.
And is already in relationships that you see the false peace and real peace. Two people are together, one has important things to say profound things, things that would give birth to many shadows, which might lead to exit from asphyxiating behavioral rituals, but also things that could be disruptive to that person and that relationship. The false good will "a priori" a harmony at all costs, even if the facade, even if it means dying inside every day. It 's a good hostage to fear and compromise, fatigue and convenience.
It comes the time when his own if you love if you love .. You must speak out and act clearly. And what you do can not be understood and hurt. Or bring down the castle. Or create you trouble, make your life a real mess and shed. But the Good, Love, Empathy, respect for self and others does not ask first "should I?". This is not your question.
There are moments of absolute reconciliation, and total encounter emerge. Others in which there can be no candles to hide behind, pretense, cunning, pull a living. Moments when something important for you to speak clearly.
Or think even those who take a position or is part of a group and a project. Intolerable before you can not always stills diplomacy, play a rearguard, diminish, soften, svirilire. There is a duty of truth that sometimes arises.
A duty of radicalism, when something sacred is at stake. There are people who believe us, there are words spoken before the fire, we have taken an oath on the altar of our hearts.
These things must be defended at the cost of carrying the sword and fire in the world.
True peace is not off the tensions of outrage of liberation.
True peace is a higher balance. Restore justice, reconciliation is possible.
Whites and blacks can take a new road, for instance, but after that you have not made any concessions to Apartheid. A peace that offers stability and peace of mind leaving work Apartheid is drinking hemlock, past the edges but with sugar.
And though Peace is a supreme goal, it is best that the Good Fight Peace cemetery.
These reflections are re-born from listening in these days of eternal return policy. The strategy would call the heated soup. Parable of the "removed", which, like everything is removed, returns, even under changing clothes.
In our political miasma confuse appearance with reality. And they want to confuse. Give an overwhelming role in behavior. Seen as hives eyes clash hard and sharp.
It is tempting to call "evil", so it has persisted over time, since the seasons consociational and then, later, to delusions (and swoons) bicameral et Paraculo later.
The ammordirsi boundaries, down to personal acquaintances and the dinner-pandering. The CUTLITE the "trade" as a parody of the dialogue. The silencer on the battles of civilization and dignity as annoying and disturbing to the "maneuver" and their dreams (nightmares for others) of "great agreement".
Before the decline, before the catastrophe moral enslavement of millions of people, not going to do the "Compagnucci Merendella of" do not have the priority of drawing smiles, symposia, arms and gala dinners. Not looking for strategies to attenuate the downward concentric circles controversial. Do not adjust themselves to acquaintances, not mumbled a language that is not yours, do not agree spartitorie practices. Do not put hot issues in the cupboards because "uncomfortable." Do not abdicate responsibility for choice loud and clear.
The whole retinue of hens Aunts and fire back with their attentions to "tone down" and turn off any small fire .. love a peace that goes beyond the stagnation and the swamp.
But people did not need to "tone down". Jam has already made saturation, and now has the mental diabetes, the dullness of passion. It needs no soporific rituals and chamomile enemas.
We are not at Buckingham Palace.
We need to revitalize the energy. In turn, wake up, shake ...
It 'a peace that is swamp, stagnant water and rancid.
Do not just babble words of peace, harmony and dialogue.
Especially at the political level. But for me the political level is the opportunity for a broader profile of speech. Not cite it only for himself, such is the misery of the "level" in which it operates.
Instead it is emblematic of a distortion, often "aware".
And then, is the place to start affecting. It is one thing to talk about peace and dialogue during a civil war. This is another dusting armantario the political office. Different then the individual plan.
The simple harmony in and of itself is not necessarily a value. But it can also be a grave voltages required.
There is no peace without justice. There is no dialogue without integrity.
The flames can save the city from the fire. But the flames can be a great jam that dampens any pressure in a faint, sweetish connubbio.
That's why the "good blood volume" is not doing good. The blood volume good, greasy and incestuous goodism may be contested by two sides. Import side, the side says it all. One is the cynical, Nietzsche, the nihilist who denies the possibility of fine root and a human action that is not manipulative (and automanipolatorio) and concerned declassified each thrust idealistic to false consciousness, illusion. The other side does not tolerate blood volume well, because he prorpio compass as the Good, which considers (on good volume status)-infringement. And Good is sometimes a breakfast tarallucci and wine, is not an "appropriate" fall tones. It is not compromise at all costs. It is sometimes hard, sometimes demanding, sometimes does not flee the conflict. Can embrace, but he also knows not to yield. Sa deal, but
not to extinguish the soul.
And is already in relationships that you see the false peace and real peace. Two people are together, one has important things to say profound things, things that would give birth to many shadows, which might lead to exit from asphyxiating behavioral rituals, but also things that could be disruptive to that person and that relationship. The false good will "a priori" a harmony at all costs, even if the facade, even if it means dying inside every day. It 's a good hostage to fear and compromise, fatigue and convenience.
It comes the time when his own if you love if you love .. You must speak out and act clearly. And what you do can not be understood and hurt. Or bring down the castle. Or create you trouble, make your life a real mess and shed. But the Good, Love, Empathy, respect for self and others does not ask first "should I?". This is not your question.
There are moments of absolute reconciliation, and total encounter emerge. Others in which there can be no candles to hide behind, pretense, cunning, pull a living. Moments when something important for you to speak clearly.
Or think even those who take a position or is part of a group and a project. Intolerable before you can not always stills diplomacy, play a rearguard, diminish, soften, svirilire. There is a duty of truth that sometimes arises.
A duty of radicalism, when something sacred is at stake. There are people who believe us, there are words spoken before the fire, we have taken an oath on the altar of our hearts.
These things must be defended at the cost of carrying the sword and fire in the world.
True peace is not off the tensions of outrage of liberation.
True peace is a higher balance. Restore justice, reconciliation is possible.
Whites and blacks can take a new road, for instance, but after that you have not made any concessions to Apartheid. A peace that offers stability and peace of mind leaving work Apartheid is drinking hemlock, past the edges but with sugar.
And though Peace is a supreme goal, it is best that the Good Fight Peace cemetery.
These reflections are re-born from listening in these days of eternal return policy. The strategy would call the heated soup. Parable of the "removed", which, like everything is removed, returns, even under changing clothes.
In our political miasma confuse appearance with reality. And they want to confuse. Give an overwhelming role in behavior. Seen as hives eyes clash hard and sharp.
It is tempting to call "evil", so it has persisted over time, since the seasons consociational and then, later, to delusions (and swoons) bicameral et Paraculo later.
The ammordirsi boundaries, down to personal acquaintances and the dinner-pandering. The CUTLITE the "trade" as a parody of the dialogue. The silencer on the battles of civilization and dignity as annoying and disturbing to the "maneuver" and their dreams (nightmares for others) of "great agreement".
Before the decline, before the catastrophe moral enslavement of millions of people, not going to do the "Compagnucci Merendella of" do not have the priority of drawing smiles, symposia, arms and gala dinners. Not looking for strategies to attenuate the downward concentric circles controversial. Do not adjust themselves to acquaintances, not mumbled a language that is not yours, do not agree spartitorie practices. Do not put hot issues in the cupboards because "uncomfortable." Do not abdicate responsibility for choice loud and clear.
The whole retinue of hens Aunts and fire back with their attentions to "tone down" and turn off any small fire .. love a peace that goes beyond the stagnation and the swamp.
But people did not need to "tone down". Jam has already made saturation, and now has the mental diabetes, the dullness of passion. It needs no soporific rituals and chamomile enemas.
We are not at Buckingham Palace.
We need to revitalize the energy. In turn, wake up, shake ...
-
Born again
Translator
